Moving in the Air ≠ Moving on the Ground 

In traditional performing arts and circus arts (dance, acrobatics, gymnastics, etc.), people’s bodies move relative to the ground; however, in aerial silks, people are suspended in the air – making this an art in which the natural, ground-based restrictions aren’t present [1]. Additionally, in silks, artists must understand their own body not in relation to a fixed position, but rather in relation to themselves and the moving silks. Head orientation, limb placement, and proprioception play a key role in mastering different figures or sequences [1].  

In order to successfully perform a figure or individual movement, teachers must explain to students what both their body and the silk must do. This differs from other circus arts like hoop or pole and even from other, more defined sports like gymnastics, since in these areas the apparatus is heavily limited by gravity and statically positioned. In contrast, silks explanations have to take into account also how the apparatus must be placed. 

According to [2], “The silk can be viewed as an extension of the body so that the aerialists can tacitly learn how to execute the movements without analyzing the exact distance between their body, silk tail, and ground.” As such, embodied learning is paramount to silks, using somatic methods in combination with verbal language to transfer information, especially regarding one’s physical safety [2]. 

In my own experience as an aerial silks student, especially since I have been a student of many different teachers with different teaching styles, most of the new figures I (and my classmates) learn have to be explained in at least 2 ways: both shown in the air by the teacher, and with verbal step-by-step instructions given while the figure is made. Usually, this means that a student (specifically beginners, as in my class) must see a figure 2 or 3 times in order to finally understand what he or she needs to do (through observational learning). 

However, observational learning is not the only thing at play here. Some students, even when understanding the technical theory of what they need to do, still struggle with their own body awareness and silk awareness while off the ground. Currently, according to 3 different teachers I talked to, the only way to overcome this is through practice. But, I wonder, have there been experimental tests to try to overcome this in a different way? (The short answer is yes, but the long answer will be explored in the next blog post) 

Furthermore, this week’s class observation I conducted yielded interesting results: in gymnastics class, instead of learning how to do a Running Front Tuck directly on the apparatus it should be performed on and trying to complete it on the first try, the teacher first instructed the gymnasts to run and jump straight up on a mini trampoline. Then, the next step was running, jumping, and doing a normal forward roll. Next, it was a handless forward roll, finally resembling the proper move. However, none of the gymnasts were able to land on their feet, and instead, the teacher was happy with them understanding the movement and landing on the mat, even if it was still in the tuck position (step 4 of the image) [3].  

Image from Gymnastics HQ, 2024 [3]. 

In contrast, in the silks class, the teacher explained a Metronome Drop (unstandardized name, but it’s what this teacher called it) by showing it, giving some verbal instructions and trusting the student to understand. Then, the student tried it out unsuccessfully twice, and finally was able to understand the knots on the third try. There was no gradual incrementation of steps as in gymnastics, rather the aerial student had to grasp the full movement from the beginning, without any progressions. 

– 

[1]  L. Froehlich, “Enhancing Aerial Circus Training Practices using a Synthesis of Traditional Coaching, Laban Movement Analysis, and Alexander Technique Frameworks,” B.A. dissertation, Dept. Dance, Scripps College, Claremont, CA, 2020.  

[2] M. Kosma, N. Erickson, C.J. Savoie, and M. Gibson, “Skill Development Versus Performativity Among Beginners in Aerial Practice: An Embodied and Meaningful Learning Experience,” International Quarterly of Community Health Education, vol. 41, pp. 173-187, January 2021. 

[3] “How to Do a Front Tuck: Drills and Exercises to learn a Front Flip in Gymnastics,” Gymnastics HQ. Accessed: Nov. 19, 2025. [Online.] Available: https://gymnasticshq.com/how-to-do-a-front-tuck/ 

Interaction Design in Aerial Silks: Teaching Proprioception in High-risk Scenarios

Aerial silks are pieces of fabric hung from the ceiling and used as an apparatus for dance. In this practice, people are suspended in the air, and students must be able to figure out how their own body must move in order to successfully complete a figure or sequence, while not falling to the ground in the process.  

As such, I ask, is there a way to blend the digital and physical world to help in the learning of new aerial silks figures? What can we as interaction designers do to help design the transfer of information of each movement in a figure or sequence? Can we use digital and/or analog methods to enhance people’s proprioception to make it easier to learn new figures? 

For example, one of the first skills you need to learn is how to do a basic foot lock. [1] explains it with the following image: 

Image from [1]

My personal motivation for this topic is the fact that I’ve been learning aerial silks for about a year and a half, in 4 different studios with 12 different teachers. Throughout this process, both the teacher and I have had to adapt to each other’s learning and teaching styles, respectively, and I have observed how different strategies help different students. Even with advanced students and teachers, the vocabulary used is not always the same, and the memory processes involved oftentimes affect the time it takes to learn a new sequence. 

This is relevant for design fields especially when thinking about full-body experiences. As we move to a more technologically integrated future, fully immersive interaction will become even more common. In this, one of the most important senses to study is proprioception – how do we teach people to be aware of their body? Besides that, this research is also relevant for the sports science field, as its findings can be used to help in the teaching of not just aerial silks, but also other non-standardized acrobatic sports. Design could help these fields through using user research and prototyping methods to reduce uncertainty in the unstandardized teaching methods and providing a good approach to help people with a less developed proprioceptive sense. 

Some of the challenges I expect are encountering little or no previous research exactly regarding this topic. I expect to find research about proprioception, maybe some research about silks, but not too many scientific papers combining the two. I also expect to find a challenge in the fact that everyone learns differently, and not only each individual country but also each individual aerial studio and teacher has its own internal language to define specific movements. In other, more studied fields, the best practice is to have a international committee where the rules are standardized for the profession worldwide. For example, gymnastics has the International Federation of Gymnastics, which is responsible for the language dictating every move. [2] 

Moving forward, I plan to: 

  • start talking with different aerial teachers and students in informal interviews to gather some background about how they deal with this problem 
  • delve deeper into shared resources to gain more knowledge 
  • ideate and list possible solutions depending on the findings 

[1] B. Borzillo. “How to Do Aerial Silks.” WikiHow. Accessed: Nov. 4, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.wikihow.com/Do-Aerial-Silks  

[2] “Mission and values”. Federation Internationale de Gymnastique. Accessed: Nov. 11, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.gymnastics.sport/site/pages/about-missionValue.php